| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![[please load images]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_u7wwRcPocSRHoE107-fXAcy0cZ94VUBCbdMlpO_EQvjfTZ-uZSY9evfxxku-HtcxVHAo1aw4K_CIC8Ye2x6pvDpuARlJJ_fRUOl7Hx4MbHhwh-wQ-fav-heYHoAzU=s0-d "[please load images]")
![[please load images]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_t58zsLviT6oN065OnWCXDXjhA-NdaNSmqVwspAJJk0g0RifbpLbLj4r53TcyKHHXHp6Jhx57JPdKX2NU-iyQgzQK6wrxZXtgGcuWXvFFWMBOBxyhupC6FyTRNHV36Ka4M=s0-d "[please load images]"){kind=small}
![[please load images]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_stgII3IIcigukcVQFCSKBKX4EbdQap5OHhOu0Yx68jpjrcEeMWebH8i5pOAqZRGp3a5pEx7gmLgL9Nvxp2HsTIzl8vseueUVX_58PYo7IyTGb26C6i0CKwMkzH_0kyta0_96rv=s0-d "[please load images]"){kind=small}
![[please load images]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uDeMely7e1Lb8Tomsp9FfoTUSbEZFIDlR4LhTt1-bPpqfoci58Jm9xRofKNM3_523jd-03o_Wrc22_YWKrtRpY-pKmI5kO0JxIh2BuS3Y-OQFC77COJpljsJyvp3qaDPn5r47I=s0-d "[please load images]"){kind=small}
![[please load images]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_s3LWNexNt7Wk3J8uCkBUuUdtNrLAvgNxaTuCvP0mMA-E6B2xBQK-JsVKdSREP_AE2sJ3_bbE55VbO9TexuBkACexf0xEOMjcy7NeWoZ3RpmflAjlDwcNwmM7H_vfwb6KlJ6vRHer76lrI=s0-d "[please load images]"){kind=small}
Fuck! Line kena cut.
14 years ago
03 October 2008
heise online news 03/10/2008
Re: Getting out the vote for the Fedora 10 election season
Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Oisin, Pascal, Max, et al.: Would you be interested in running a
> special issue of Fedora Weekly News -- or simply devoting a regularly
> scheduled issue -- to reporting on IRC chat interviews/Q&A with
> community members running for elections?
>
> It seems like everyone, including the Board, is in favor of a general
> election where FESCo, the Board, etc. will run their elections
> concurrently sometime with 30 days after release of Fedora 10. To
> give the community a better idea of where nominees stand, the
> Marketing group will have a method for gathering questions and posing
> them to the nominees. If FWN were to report those answers they could
> potentially reach a lot more people, thus resulting in a more informed
> electorate.
> Oisin, Pascal, Max, et al.: Would you be interested in running a
> special issue of Fedora Weekly News -- or simply devoting a regularly
> scheduled issue -- to reporting on IRC chat interviews/Q&A with
> community members running for elections?
>
> It seems like everyone, including the Board, is in favor of a general
> election where FESCo, the Board, etc. will run their elections
> concurrently sometime with 30 days after release of Fedora 10. To
> give the community a better idea of where nominees stand, the
> Marketing group will have a method for gathering questions and posing
> them to the nominees. If FWN were to report those answers they could
> potentially reach a lot more people, thus resulting in a more informed
> electorate.
This seems like a great idea to me, and a nice way for FWN to help
spread the word on getting more community involvement in the election!
One suggestion might be to include these as they come in, in regular FWN
issues, and then put together a special issue of all of these together,
along with any other additional content y'all feel would be useful,
closer to the election, perhaps at the beginning of the voting period.
Other suggestions most welcome!
- pascal
_______________________________________________
Fedora-news-list mailing list
Fedora-news-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-news-list
02 October 2008
Re: Getting out the vote for the Fedora 10 election season
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 08:16:27PM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> 2008/10/1 Paul W. Frields <stickster@gmail.com>:
> > I bet the Fedora News crew would jump at the chance to devote a
> > special issue to this coverage, if someone but asks politely and
> > describes the need concisely.
>
>
> well those conditions definitely disqualify me.
> 2008/10/1 Paul W. Frields <stickster@gmail.com>:
> > I bet the Fedora News crew would jump at the chance to devote a
> > special issue to this coverage, if someone but asks politely and
> > describes the need concisely.
>
>
> well those conditions definitely disqualify me.
Heh.
Oisin, Pascal, Max, et al.: Would you be interested in running a
special issue of Fedora Weekly News -- or simply devoting a regularly
scheduled issue -- to reporting on IRC chat interviews/Q&A with
community members running for elections?
It seems like everyone, including the Board, is in favor of a general
election where FESCo, the Board, etc. will run their elections
concurrently sometime with 30 days after release of Fedora 10. To
give the community a better idea of where nominees stand, the
Marketing group will have a method for gathering questions and posing
them to the nominees. If FWN were to report those answers they could
potentially reach a lot more people, thus resulting in a more informed
electorate.
Are you interested in this idea? If you're not already, you may want
to join the fedora-marketing-list to follow and help with the
discussion:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
OSDir.com - Fedora 10 Beta "Cambridge" Released
"OSDir.com" - 1 new article
Fedora 10 Beta "Cambridge" ReleasedMore Recent Articles |
  |
Click here to safely unsubscribe now from "OSDir.com" or change subscription settings
Unsubscribe from all current and future newsletters powered by FeedBlitz
| Your requested content delivery powered by FeedBlitz, LLC, 9 Thoreau Way, Sudbury, MA 01776, USA. +1.978.776.9498 |
heise online news 02/10/2008
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re: Getting out the vote for the Fedora 10 election season
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 09:49:08AM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
> > Of course, those meetings should be recorded and logged
> > somewhere so that people who could not attend can read them
> > (summarized maybe ?).
>
> None of that is impossible. If we ran it like our current public Board
> meetings like Jon has suggested, it would be logged and archived.
> Someone with the gumption to do it could then do a summary based on
> the chatlog.
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Mathieu Bridon (bochecha)
> > Of course, those meetings should be recorded and logged
> > somewhere so that people who could not attend can read them
> > (summarized maybe ?).
>
> None of that is impossible. If we ran it like our current public Board
> meetings like Jon has suggested, it would be logged and archived.
> Someone with the gumption to do it could then do a summary based on
> the chatlog.
I bet the Fedora News crew would jump at the chance to devote a
special issue to this coverage, if someone but asks politely and
describes the need concisely.
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0890 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 wireshark - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0890
wireshark security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0890.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/wireshark-1.0.3-EL3.3.x86_64.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/wireshark-gnome-1.0.3-EL3.3.x86_64.rpm
source:
updates/SRPMS/wireshark-1.0.3-EL3.3.src.rpm
You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command:
yum update wireshark
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0890 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 wireshark - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2008:0890
wireshark security update for CentOS 3 i386:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0890.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
i386:
updates/i386/RPMS/wireshark-1.0.3-EL3.3.i386.rpm
updates/i386/RPMS/wireshark-gnome-1.0.3-EL3.3.i386.rpm
source:
updates/SRPMS/wireshark-1.0.3-EL3.3.src.rpm
You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command:
yum update wireshark
Tru
--
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
